Oklahoma court: forced oral sex isn't rape...what?

Have you ever been so angry that you want to punch someone in the throat? Same. That’s how I feel towards an Oklahoma appeals court right about now. The court ruled that “forced oral sex is not rape if the victim is unconscious from drinking”. I’m sorry but who THE FUCK do you think you are?

Oklahoma has different laws for consent of vaginal and anal intercourse but now there is a divide among oral. How is it that vaginal and anal intercourse is different from oral sex? If I am intoxicated to the point that I am unconscious it’s okay for you to put your genitals in my mouth? Please tell me why the hell that makes any sense?

This all comes from a case where a 16-year-old girl was taken to the hospital with a blood alcohol content of .34 after drinking at the park with friends. A 17-year-old boy that was with her offered to take her to her grandmother’s house and had to carry her to his car. Another boy who rode in the car with them said that she was in and out of consciousness. When the young girl awoke at the hospital, they were performing a sexual assault examination and the 17-year-old boy’s DNA was found around her mouth and on the back of her leg.

The appeals court ruled that “Forcible sodomy cannot occur where a victim is so intoxicated as to be completely unconscious at the time of the sexual act of oral copulation”. If you cannot walk, talk, or keep your eyes open, you should not be able to have a penis inserted into your mouth.

This ruling only furthers the thought that rape is a victim’s fault “they shouldn’t have drank so much” or “they were asking for it”. You know what I have to say to that? Maybe if you weren’t such a piece of trash, you could get someone to suck your dick without having to have them be unconscious first.

Stay classy, Courtney